Express Or Local?

When I was in high school, it took me about 45-50 minutes to commute to midtown during rush hour.  That was taking a local train all the way, due to construction on the Manhattan Bridge.

Now, it takes me more than an hour to commute an equivalent distance!

If I take a local train the whole way, it takes me 60-65 minutes!

If I take an express train, it isn’t any faster.  First, the N is local in Manhattan, which decreases the savings I would get from the N.  Second, the trains all get backed up at DeKalb Avenue and into the Manhattan Bridge.  There’s no benefit to taking the express when it gets stuck for 10-15 minutes.

The Manhattan Bridge is falling apart.  To conserve the bridge, the MTA adopted a policy “At most one train can be on the bridge in each direction at a time.”  However, that means that trains back up on both sides of the bridge.

The express trains interleave at DeKalb Avenue.  The N goes along 4th avenue in Brooklyn and then up Broadway in Manhattan.  The D goes along 4th avenue and then up 6th Avenue.  The Q goes along the Brighton line and then up Broadway.  The B goes along the Brighton line and then up 6th Avenue.

Do you see the problem?  If a B train gets delayed, then it backs up at DeKalb avenue.  The D train gets stuck at DeKalb avenue.  This causes the N to also get backed up, because it can’t pass the D.

Under normal circumstances, the backup would occur on the Manhattan Bridge.  However, the MTA has a policy “Trains can’t wait on the Manhattan Bridge”.  This means that the backup occurs at DeKalb Avenue (the stop before the Manhattan Bridge).  This also means that any delay affects *ALL* trains, rather than just 6th avenue or Broadway.

If *ANY* of a D, N, Q, or B gets delayed, then the N gets delayed.  The result is that there’s no benefit to taking the express.

As another complication, sometimes there’s so many people that I wouldn’t fit on the express train.  (I’m not pushy enough and I don’t like squeezing in.)  The MTA cut back on the number of trains, even during peak rush hour.  On the local train, I can usually get a seat.

After a couple of tries, I took the express and discovered that it wasn’t much faster than the local.  It’s at best 5-10 minutes faster, and it’s frequently not faster.

If I take the local train, at least I can get a seat and use my phone on the train.  I’m giving up on taking an express.

That is an interesting symptom of the decline.  In 1992, it took me 45-50 minutes to commute to midtown during rush hour.  Now, it takes me 60-65 minutes.  The Manhattan Bridge is falling apart, due to lack of maintenance.  Even for an apples-to-apples comparison (local all the way), it was 15-20 minutes faster 20 years ago, to go an equivalent distance!  (I got off at a different stop in Manhattan in high school, but it really is an equivalent distance trip.)

3 Responses to Express Or Local?

  1. If you are writing software, can’t you spend a few days at home doing the same work?

    Actually there are real advantages in actually going to work and having all the workers in the same room or building.

    In one job, all the other software developers in my group spent several days at home PRETENDING TO WORK. I went into the office every day. As a result I was asked to do much more work and asked to help out with other projects.

    By helping out with other projects I helped the company in a big way.

    Just minutes before I got fired, one manager told me the work I had done had really helped the company. Obviously at that time I didn’t know I would be fired minutes later.

    Ironically all my co-workers that PRETENDED to work from home, AND were hired solely on the basis of being friends with a couple of manager, kept their jobs. I got fired.

    By coincidence (ha!) only the non-managerial workers that had been in the company long enough to get share options were fired!

    One fired worker was re-hired as a contractor via a third-party company. After a while he realized his new pay did not cover his rent and he had to leave London and give up his new part-time job.

  2. Back in 2004/2005, the London Underground train system was having signalling problems.

    The parts used were so old they could no longer be maintained and nobody in the UK was making these signalling parts.

    The only solution was to trawl India for these signalling parts as parts of India used the same train equipment as the UK!

  3. >One fired worker was re-hired as a contractor via a third-party company. After a while
    >he realized his new pay did not cover his rent and he had to leave London and give up
    >his new part-time job.

    I just wanted to add one more thing to my previous comment. The webmaster was fired by the venture capital company and then re-hired back on a lower wage via an external company. Eventually he had to resign as he was paid so little.

    Months later the company was sold and then sold again. I heard some people made so much money from their share options, they would never have to work again.

    The webmaster was re-hired back on such a low salary he couldn’t afford to pay his rent. I got cheated out of my share options.

    Yet some people, who did no sensible work, got loads of cash and moved to cushy new jobs in a big tech company.

    If you work hard you get screwed. If you do nothing you get rewarded.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>