The Daily Show And PETA

There was an interesting bit on the Wednesday February 15 episode of The Daily Show. Wyatt Cenac was making fun of PETA. You can watch it here.

They were ridiculing PETA, for a stupid lawsuit. PETA objected to whales in cages and performing. They filed a lawsuit saying that is “slavery”. Even though the lawsuit failed, it was a publicity stunt.

Whales and cows and dogs and cats are property. You should be able to do whatever you want with them. It is disgusting, but not illegal, if an animal is abused. (That is a common State lie. If a lot of people think that something is offensive, then it should be illegal.)

Watch that bit, and see if you notice anything unusual about the PETA woman. Try to identify it before reading my observation.

SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE

Did you see it? When the PETA woman was talking, only half her mouth moved! Watch again and see if you notice.

You can see that frequently, when watching professional liars. If only half of someone’s mouth moves when they talk, it’s a good indication that they’re lying! That isn’t an absolute indication. Some people don’t give that tell, especially world-class liars and entertainers. That PETA woman doesn’t appear on TV much, making her a less-skilled liar.

I was disappointed that The Daily Show writers missed that bit. When the PETA woman spoke, only half her mouth moved! That was the funniest part of that segment.

2 Responses to The Daily Show And PETA

  1. Did you also notice the hermaphroditical/transgender appearance of the two women? You touched on this before in some observations you made, I believe one involved the performer “Lady Gaga”. Perhaps make a comment about that again? I have seen the emasculation of men in other ways, such as on popular tv shows. On the long running hit “Friends”, the two most educated men, one a scientist and the other a successful professional, were repeatedly made fun of and otherwise had their sexual prowess antagonized by the women who were supposedly their “friends”. Meanwhile one of the men, who could barely hold a job and couldn’t find his way out of a wet paper bag with a flashlight and a map, was repeatedly glorified as sexually attractive. How about other shows that depict the man as a lazy moron lucky to have his brilliant career woman wife? How about the open promotion and glorification of homosexuality? I have nothing against people who are gay, I believe in free market, natural laws and liberty just like a lot of us here. But doesn’t it seem like for gays to represent about 5-10 percent of the population that it’s a bit odd that they are 50 percent of the characters in tv and media? You have also talked about laws which are unfavorable to men in marriage and children cases. Ultimately, my conclusion is that all of this is a part of the weakening of men, because the bankster elite are scared of potent, intelligent, non-parasitic, productive men standing strong and helping others “unplug” from the Matrix and overthrow their power.

    • Those two women didn’t look that much like men. They were on the parasitic side. Evil women tend to look like men.

      Lady Gaga looks more like a man than a woman. Conversely, Justin Bieber frequenly looks more like a woman than a man. I’ve noticed that many “attractive” women celebrities look like men, and “attractive” male celebrities look like women.

      For another example, a man with no chest hair sort of looks like a woman.

      Here’s another common fnord on “Friends” and other “sitcoms”. There are hidden messages for “You should feel uncomfortable about sexuality.” Those shows are one big hidden advertisement for negative attitudes towards sex.

      Yes, the mainstream media does promote homosexuality. Look at it this way. If you’re a homosexual, you have an incentive to convince other people “Being a homosexual is desirable!” Then, you have more potential partners.

      Most reality shows like “The Amazing Race” or “Survivor” or “Big Brother” have a “token homosexual”. The % of “homosexual reality show contestants” is greater than the % of homosexuals in the overall population. Even more annoying, on “Big Brother”, the “token homosexual” is frequently also the “token African-American”.

      Another problem is that divorce law is biased against men. There are many other blogs that talk about this a lot more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>